Search for: "State v. Braun" Results 41 - 60 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Christopher Danzig
Braun Medical Inc., Discovery Disputes, Discovery Sanctions, Foley & Lardner, Intellectual Property, Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, Patents, United States District Court for the Central District of California [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 9:10 pm
Petr Válek, Czech-Austrian Declaration on Jurisdictional Immunities of State-Owned Cultural Property Vít Alexander Schorm, The Czech Republic before the European Court of Human Rights in 2014 Milan Beránek, List of Ratified International Treaties which Entered into Force for the Czech Republic from 1st January 2014 till 31st December 2014 [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
  The AmeriKat met Philippe Campolini (Simont Braun) several years ago at the Young EPLAW Congress over a beer in Brussels. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
Braun Brothers Brushes SUFFOLK COUNTYCivil Practice Inmate Granted Leave to File, Serve Late Notice Of Claim Under GML §50-e(5) for Molestation Catterson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:15 am
Michael Gomez KINGS COUNTYInsurance LawHusband's Insurance Policy Unambiguously Excludes Wife's Vehicle From Liability Coverage Braun v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, Ikhilov has stated a cause of action against the Lyubarskys to recover damages for contribution (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d at 5). [read post]