Search for: "State v. Brazile"
Results 61 - 80
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 1:19 pm
[Brazil][Habitual residence][Petition denied] In Soares v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Sugarloaf Funding LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:47 pm
Brazil v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
Salo V. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
See, e.g., Blockowicz v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
The State shall always be responsible for expropriations decreed by itself or through its agents. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
Haier I and Sisvel v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:51 am
Brazil v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 5:00 pm
Developing countries seeking access to the economic prosperity promised by international trade long argued that joining the WTO meant they had to follow rules that the United States and European countries could flaunt. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:27 am
Petitioner and Respondent had two children together, GTH and JWH, who were citizens of both the United States and Brazil. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
(Itiquira), the employer, for the construction of a hydroelectric power plant in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:39 pm
We are happy to report that the Department of State has released an important announcement that describes the agency’s compliance with the recent court ruling, Gomez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
