Search for: "State v. Breaker" Results 21 - 40 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption giving the joint lead judgments stated that the fundamental principle is that the penalty rule regulates only the contractual remedy available for the breach of primary contractual obligations, and not the fairness of those primary obligations themselves. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 5:31 am by Aparajita Lath
In the famous case of R Rajagopal v State of Tamil Nadu, the Supreme had held that the Nakkheeran (a magazine) did not require consent to publish the life story of the serial killer Auto Shankar, insofar as it was based on public records. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
  IIROC ultimately made a number of recommendations to address the issues identified, including: (i) a review of the current market-wide circuit breaker to determine whether trigger levels are appropriate and whether an independent Canadian circuit breaker level should be employed; (ii) considering whether single stock circuit breakers should be implemented; (iii) the adoption of volatility controls; (iv) considering how to effectively manage… [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm by David Kessler (US) and Susan Ross (US)
Tie-breaker/Bonus question: Which two states have comprehensive privacy laws scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2025? [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:11 am by Paul Horwitz
  That is why the case that forms the subject of this chapter has its name: Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm by JP Zanders
In their review of the articles, state parties will have to acknowledge the invocation of Articles V and VI. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
Judgment for Specific Performance Reversed Because Dispute About Time and Manner of Payment Prevented the Court From Applying the Rule of Reasonable Time and MannerPatel v. [read post]