Search for: "State v. Breaker" Results 81 - 100 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Ritholtz denied a motion to dismiss claims for breach of fiduciary duty brought against a non-member designated as tie-breaker under the LLC’s operating agreement, finding factual issues whether the tie-breaker engaged in any misconduct. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Fakiris v Gusmar Enterprises LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 51665(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 21, 2016]. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:17 am by SHG
Circuit’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:50 am
As an example, the letter cites this LA Times article in which anonymous law enforcement sources stated that body camera footage showed the shooting of a homeless man. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by Anonymous
The suggested fine is $100 because it was believed by the State Attorney's Office that individuals will be less likely to fight the charges. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs, a number of businesses that cater to Spring Breakers and eight John and Jane Doe Spring Breakers, sought a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of these ordinances. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
      Tell us about one or two significant cases or experiences in your career.Quantel v Adobe in 1997 would be the first on the list. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy as a potential tie-breaker, as he so often is. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
The test which has replaced it is whether a stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party. [read post]