Search for: "State v. Breaker"
Results 81 - 100
of 225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 3:34 am
Ritholtz denied a motion to dismiss claims for breach of fiduciary duty brought against a non-member designated as tie-breaker under the LLC’s operating agreement, finding factual issues whether the tie-breaker engaged in any misconduct. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
Fakiris v Gusmar Enterprises LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 51665(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 21, 2016]. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:37 am
U.S.A. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:17 am
Circuit’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:31 am
A lot of readers are familiar with Olmstead v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:50 am
As an example, the letter cites this LA Times article in which anonymous law enforcement sources stated that body camera footage showed the shooting of a homeless man. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
The suggested fine is $100 because it was believed by the State Attorney's Office that individuals will be less likely to fight the charges. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm
Plaintiffs, a number of businesses that cater to Spring Breakers and eight John and Jane Doe Spring Breakers, sought a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of these ordinances. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
Pratt’s circumstances were very similar to a 2008 case, State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am
Tell us about one or two significant cases or experiences in your career.Quantel v Adobe in 1997 would be the first on the list. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
Kennedy as a potential tie-breaker, as he so often is. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
The test which has replaced it is whether a stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:13 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption giving the joint lead judgments stated that the fundamental principle is that the penalty rule regulates only the contractual remedy available for the breach of primary contractual obligations, and not the fairness of those primary obligations themselves. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
(E.g., Saltonstall v. [read post]
