Search for: "State v. Breaker" Results 81 - 100 of 225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Ritholtz denied a motion to dismiss claims for breach of fiduciary duty brought against a non-member designated as tie-breaker under the LLC’s operating agreement, finding factual issues whether the tie-breaker engaged in any misconduct. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Fakiris v Gusmar Enterprises LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 51665(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 21, 2016]. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:17 am by SHG
Circuit’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:50 am
As an example, the letter cites this LA Times article in which anonymous law enforcement sources stated that body camera footage showed the shooting of a homeless man. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by Anonymous
The suggested fine is $100 because it was believed by the State Attorney's Office that individuals will be less likely to fight the charges. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs, a number of businesses that cater to Spring Breakers and eight John and Jane Doe Spring Breakers, sought a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of these ordinances. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
      Tell us about one or two significant cases or experiences in your career.Quantel v Adobe in 1997 would be the first on the list. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy as a potential tie-breaker, as he so often is. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
The test which has replaced it is whether a stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption giving the joint lead judgments stated that the fundamental principle is that the penalty rule regulates only the contractual remedy available for the breach of primary contractual obligations, and not the fairness of those primary obligations themselves. [read post]