Search for: "State v. Brewer" Results 281 - 300 of 522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 9:19 am by Jon Sands
Brewer, No. 12-15381 (2-28-12) (per curiam by McKeown, Berzon and Rawlinson).Editorial note: This is an Az FPD caseThe State intends to execute petitioner on March 8th. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
As the Court said in Brewer-Elliott, 'It is not for a State by courts or legislature, in dealing with the general subject of beds or streams, to adopt a retroactive rule for determining navigability which . . . [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
  (North Carolina's first sterilization act, passed in 1929, was struck down by the North Carolina Supreme Court in Brewer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, involves the famous Arizona immigration statute, S.B. 1070; courtwatchers began anticipating the case even before Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed the law at issue in April 2010. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
  All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
” More broadly, it is a state of balance, peace, blessing, bounty and wholeness in which all is right with the world because proper rules are being followed: “Hozho reflects the intellectual concept of order, the emotional state of happiness, the moral notions of good and fairness, the biological condition of health and well-being, and the artistic characteristics of balance, harmony, and beauty. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
In short, not even the most radical free marketeers on the Court, Brewer and Peckham, defended anything remotely approaching the laissez-faire jurisprudence advocated by the likes of treatise writer Christopher Tiedeman. [read post]