Search for: "State v. Bridges" Results 261 - 280 of 2,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
One can see that all the time, such as when he managed to avoid an overturning of the Illinois Bridge doctrine while still finding for the plaintiffs in the Pepper v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
" (China to promote 'sinicization of religion', says Xi Jinping: He said that religious groups should stand as a bridge and a bond connecting the party and the government with people). [read post]
  The Secretary of Transportation will convene and consult with a panel of national experts in rural and urban transportation, including (i) self-driving vehicle producers, manufacturers, and technology developers, (ii) States and State departments of transportation, (iii) metropolitan planning organizations, (iv) the motor carrier industry, (v) representatives of public transportation agencies or organizations, (vi) highway safety and academic groups, (vii) nonprofit… [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place, and largely endorsing Texas’s scheme to insulate its law from the fundamental protections of Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
The proposed draft updates references to subsequent legislation, in particular the Data Protection Act 2018 and the judgement in Bridges v South Wales Police. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am by rainey Reitman
United States (SCOTUS) EFF CFAA Revisions – Penalties and Access (EFF) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Reform (EFF)  Electoral Security: Election Security (EFF) Transcript Tarah: So in 2010, I was getting married for the first time. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Corizon, Inc., 949 F.3d 489, 506 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (same); United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am by CMS
The relevant provision of the New York Convention – article V(1)(a) – can be found in section 103(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act, and states that “the recognition or enforcement of the award may be refused if the person against whom it is invoked proves (…) that the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law to which the parties subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made. [read post]