Search for: "State v. Bridges" Results 81 - 100 of 2,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm by NARF
Pollack (Cultural Resources; National Historic Preservation Act; Tribal Consultation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html J.P. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am by Florian Mueller
Both parties have been granted leave to file pleadings until then.Unlike the situation between IP Bridge and OPPO, the IP Bridge v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
I just reported on Apple's latest patent settlement (with Japan's national patent licensing firm IP Bridge). [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
As such, he builds another bridge and dismantles a long-standing barrier that has existed since the Supreme Court’s establishment in 1789. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:25 am by Scott Riddle
The fact that this case is not within the mine-run of civil RICO cases means that its proximate cause analysis differs somewhat from the analysis in cases such as Bridge v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:51 pm by NARF
Department of the Interior (Cultural Resources; Sacred Sites; Geothermal Projects) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]