Search for: "State v. Bridges"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Phoenix Bridge Company, 98 N.H. 261 (1953), was a suit by a concrete subcontractor on a State bridge project who agreed to “be bound by and conform to the general specifications in all respects wherein they apply to the work embraced in this agreement” and agreed to accept payment “for the quantity of material approved by the State Highway Commission. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:30 pm
Diego Mejía-Lemos, The suitability of investor-State dispute settlement and host State counterclaims for implementing climate change international responsibility Ji Ma, Bridging multinational corporations' investment-climate gap: Prospects for the direct claims approach Oliver Hailes, Unjust enrichment in investor–State arbitration: A principled limit on compensation for future income from fossil fuels Case NoteTadesse M. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Humana, 382 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2004), abrogated in part on other grounds by Bridge v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
Blue v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
The Band and Michigan have sued Enbridge in U.S. federal and state court. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:45 am
In Davidson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The opposition division, however, decided that example 3 of D1 using ENGAGE® 8400 was a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step, without dealing with that argument (Reasons for the decision, page 9, lines 6-16).In the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant preemptively dealt with the enablement of the disclosure of example 3 of D1 and submitted that D18 is cross-referenced in the paragraph bridging pages 14 and 15 of D1 as a document describing the preparation of… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
”—Thomas V. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
The Glendoe Scheme is a state-of-the-art facility first opened by HM The Queen in 2009 and the only large-scale hydro-electric station of its type built in the UK in the last 50 years. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:36 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The FCA has stated that serious breaches will be prioritised and that it will act “swiftly and assertively” where necessary. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
The possibility of this bridge seems important to me, as we see various movements to rethink the role that economics ought to play in legal thinking. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
My own opinion is more nuanced and attempts to bridge the vast chasm between these two opposing views. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
Thomas, in which the five dissenting judges stated that because “state courts lack jurisdiction to hear Exchange Act claims … the bylaw provision is a litigation bridge to nowhere, depriving shareholders of any forum in which to pursue derivative claims. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
The DoubleTree Dartford Bridge was a 40 minute walk from the closest shops and fast food restaurants. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
The dissent described the forum selection clause as “a litigation bridge to nowhere” because state courts lack jurisdiction to hear Exchange Act claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:47 pm
"] In Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
This post focuses on those rules as they apply to states before turning to the possibility of individual criminal liability. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Case Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
