Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 81 - 100 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
  The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:43 am
This issue has led to divergent opinions in the district courts.The decision in Briggs Avenue LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  Habeas is denied if the state appellate court's deferential review of the trial court is at least reasonable.Briggs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
Michael Silverleaf QC also made submissions on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm by Kate Fort
Connecticut Law Review Symposium: Interrogating Haaland v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
The Supreme Court On 24 January 2018, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs heard the appeal in the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am by CMS
The Supreme Court closely considered the true construction of the 2002 Act in their judgment, stating that the appeal turned upon the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the legislation. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm by Jon Sands
Moreover, the state court (Arizona) had a reasonable basis to deny the claim.U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Stephens and Lord Briggs) would have dismissed Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 8:25 pm
Briggs, 64 M.J. 285, 287 (C.A.A.F. 2007)(citing United States v. [read post]