Search for: "State v. Britt" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2009, 3:08 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court has just held, in Britt v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:59 am
Thanks to this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, which is titled "Felons and the Right To Bear Arms," I discovered that late yesterday the North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Britt v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:08 pm by Robbie L. Vaughn, Esq.
Britt, 2012 NY Slip Op 22034 – NY: Appellate Term, 1st Dept. 2012, the court stated the following: We agree, essentially for reasons stated by Civil Court, that petitioner-landlords are barred [...] [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:10 am
Eugene Volokh at the Volokh Conspiracy and Doug Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy bring word of an opinion issued yesterday in Britt v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:02 am by John Diekman
"For statutory purposes, a prior action terminates when a nondiscretionary appeal, or an appeal taken as of right, is exhausted.A demand for punitive damages will be struck where the action involves a private dispute, and plaintiff has not demonstrated that defendants' conduct was aimed at the public generally.Case: Britt v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
Britt Latham Brian Irving In the following guest post, Britt K. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stated differently, "[t]he test is whether a proper defense would have altered the result of the prior action" (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169, 173 [1987] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]) which, in the context of a criminal action, requires proof that the criminal defendant would not have been convicted (see Britt v Legal Aid Socy., 95 NY2d 443, 446 [2000]). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:05 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court could help rein in the administrative state by overruling Auer v. [read post]