Search for: "State v. Buchanan" Results 1 - 20 of 333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
That is, let's suppose that in NYS Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan  How far will Republicans go with their anti-tax jihad? [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
If the federal court plaintiffs lack standing or a cause of action, or if the Court holds that state court judges are not proper party-defendants, or that for injunctive relief to be effective it must--but is not permitted to--run against private non-parties, then the Texas law will remain in effect pending resolution in state court and a possible eventual return to the US Supreme Court posing the question whether a six-week ban is permissible on the merits.For the U.S. and/or the… [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am by dferriero
Polk and Secretary of State James Buchanan, March 8, 1847. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/175516195  Native American Relations in Texas, From the Texas State Library and Archives Commission [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]