Search for: "State v. Buchanan"
Results 1 - 20
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
In Bob Jones University v. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 10:56 am
MalaysiaTuanku Nur Zahirah v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 2:27 pm
Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 5:43 pm
I don't know if Justice Buchanan thought up the hypothetical himself, if it came out of one of the briefs, or if it came from one of the other justices, but I found it very insightful and informative. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:58 am
Ranjitsinh and Others v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 7:11 am
But the PVR owner does not get the monopoly on this descriptive name - in fact, others are obliged to use the denomination to describe the variety - and this means that PVR owners cannot register trade marks for the denomination: Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2015] FCA 756.Only one other domain name dispute has dealt with variety denominations - albeit as a defence. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 2:16 pm
Note that in Buchanan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 11:33 am
" Buchanan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Category #4 includes six presidents who unilaterally donated foreign state gifts to the Smithsonian Institute: Presidents Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, and Calvin Coolidge. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 3:08 pm
Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 5:48 am
In Buchanan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 7:30 am
These laws were invalidated by a unanimous decision of the "conservative" Supreme Court in Buchanan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:29 am
Or perhaps Republicans would simply nominate Trump for president and expect--with some justification given the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Oregon (1908) Buchanan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
" Assuming that's true, one would want to know whether it's a response to a shift in attitudes or mostly a litigation-avoidance strategy in response to Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:17 am
Rich Ford: Everyone who went to law school remembers Shelley v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
Trump's lies are so transparently false--e.g., every constitutional scholar wanted Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
As LaCroix later explains, this consensus “held that slavery was a local matter, that the states alone could regulate it, and that therefore the U.S. government lacked authority over slavery in the states” (216). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:32 am
It's part of why I think Trump v. [read post]
