Search for: "State v. Buchanan" Results 221 - 240 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by David Bernstein
” Finally, MacLean seems to suggest the economist James Buchanan, the villain of the book, developed his “public choice” ideas in response to Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm by almaraz
Buchanan What Kind of Environment Do We Owe Future Generations? [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At RealClear Education, John McLaughlin lauds the recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:54 am by Anne Olson
Seven years later, in 1917, the United States Supreme Court held that a similar Louisville, Kentucky racial zoning ordinance was unconstitutional in Buchanan v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:06 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Kruse v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:55 am by Mark Graber
Constitutional theory as interpretation places Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Ricochet, Richard Epstein argues that in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Legal Beagle
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Legal Beagle
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the… [read post]