Search for: "State v. Buchanan" Results 341 - 360 of 442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Steve
We argued a similar limitations issue years ago in United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 7:11 am by Jocelyn Bosse
But the PVR owner does not get the monopoly on this descriptive name - in fact, others are obliged to use the denomination to describe the variety - and this means that PVR owners cannot register trade marks for the denomination: Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2015] FCA 756.Only one other domain name dispute has dealt with variety denominations -  albeit as a defence. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 7:30 am by David Bernstein
These laws were invalidated by a unanimous decision of the "conservative" Supreme Court in Buchanan v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
  To borrow from Reyes v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
That is, let's suppose that in NYS Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:00 am
(SRIN004841) LACV006604 - Buchanan County, created 4/23/2008 and disposed of on 2/2/2010. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan During the more than seven years that I have been warning about the inevitable end of constitutional democracy in the United States, I have almost exclusively focused on the legal mechanics of how this process will play out. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm by David Bernstein
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What he did not do, obviously, was either to agree with his predecessor James Buchanan, that the national government was without the power to prevent secession even if, as Buchanan in fact believed, that would be illegal, or to embark on serious negotiations with the South as to how to achieve some sort of peaceful secession. [read post]