Search for: "State v. Buchanan"
Results 381 - 400
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 9:47 pm
The language of the Cession Act was extremely influential: It was added verbatim to the 1819 Treaty with Spain (the Florida Cession), advocated by Secretary of State James Buchanan for the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and added to the 1867 Treaty Russia which gave us Alaskaâ€â [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Thus, in Sandra Kirkland v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
I have a column that appears today on FindLaw, discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:58 am
New York State Court of Appeals: People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:44 pm
Buchanan, No. 101 Defendant’s murder conviction is reversed [...] [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Thus New Yorkers need not worry that police without warrants or cause could attach such devices to their vehicles in New York and record the vehicles' minute by minute location.In People v Buchanan (6/30/09) the Court again found that the New York Constitution provides protections that have not been clearly found under the United State Constitution. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
See Buchanan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:21 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
State v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:01 am
Buchanan [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
But, in any state composed of citizens with a firmer sense of national identity -- the United States, Germany, Australia, Argentina, among other apparently federal regimes -- federalism is a mere atavism. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 7:44 am
The case is People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
In Bray v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
In Bray v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
In People v Buchanan [4th Dept 6/6/08] (here) the Fourth Department unanimously held that the use of a stun belt that is not visible to the jury is subject to the same judicial scrutiny as other forms of physical restraint that are visible. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:40 am
Today in United States v. [read post]
