Search for: "State v. Buchanan"
Results 61 - 80
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
Buchanan & Michael C. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The Bush v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
Buchanan"Florida bill would require bloggers who write about the governor and legislators to register with the state," warns the headline of an NBC news article. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
What he did not do, obviously, was either to agree with his predecessor James Buchanan, that the national government was without the power to prevent secession even if, as Buchanan in fact believed, that would be illegal, or to embark on serious negotiations with the South as to how to achieve some sort of peaceful secession. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
No one thought these states were no longer in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:24 pm
(Plus it's got all those confusing "Bishop v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
Police Dep't v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
Justice Buchanan writes the majority opinion and says:In Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
” ZW Acquisition LLC v. [read post]
