Search for: "State v. Buchanan"
Results 141 - 160
of 450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 pm
Buchanan, 985 F.2d 1372, 1378 (8th Cir.1993) (employing clear error standard); United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 5:43 pm
I don't know if Justice Buchanan thought up the hypothetical himself, if it came out of one of the briefs, or if it came from one of the other justices, but I found it very insightful and informative. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am
Taylor v Buchanan – does it violate the First Amendment to force Michigan lawyers to pay money to join their Bar Association? [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia’s opinion states: “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 4:00 am
There's also a doctrinal response, appealing to Train v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Category #4 includes six presidents who unilaterally donated foreign state gifts to the Smithsonian Institute: Presidents Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, and Calvin Coolidge. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
This would not be possible without the hard work of our multi-state team composed of Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Bruce Buchanan and myself, John Gihon. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
Senior partner Dave Buchanan represents individual and corporate plaintiffs in state and federal courts nationwide. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
The first big case, NFIB v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:07 pm
The Court relied on its 1987 decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Ins. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
See, e.g., Henry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm
Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575, 577 (Fla. 1966); see also Action Realty and Invs., Inc. v. [read post]
