Search for: "State v. Buchanan"
Results 141 - 160
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 pm
Buchanan, 985 F.2d 1372, 1378 (8th Cir.1993) (employing clear error standard); United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am
Taylor v Buchanan – does it violate the First Amendment to force Michigan lawyers to pay money to join their Bar Association? [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
This would not be possible without the hard work of our multi-state team composed of Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Bruce Buchanan and myself, John Gihon. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
The first big case, NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:07 pm
The Court relied on its 1987 decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
See, e.g., Henry v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Ins. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm
Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575, 577 (Fla. 1966); see also Action Realty and Invs., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
It is hardly surprising that politicians are sometimes opportunistic rather than principled. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Last year, in Entergy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
