Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 201 - 220 of 24,677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
And when the Nassau County Supreme Court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the litigation -- on the grounds that JB hadn’t suffered a “serious injury” as contemplated by the state’s Insurance Law -- an appeal ensued.On its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that the County and its co-defendants didn’t meet their burden of proof in this instance. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
Notably, § 112, r 6 does not state that the Specification must also describe equivalents of that structure. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, plaintiff fails to plead facts stating a claim for both “fraud on the court” and under Judiciary Law§ 487. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
The burden of proof remains high for this kind of prosecution. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]