Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 41 - 60
of 24,530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:57 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am
Good Meat Project v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:59 am
The court examined a 1907 Iowa case, Zinser v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:56 am
The Court of Appeals reverses.The case is Nastri v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SCOTUS explained in Sec'y of State of Md. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, in the 2014 case of Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
