Search for: "State v. Burgess" Results 161 - 180 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
” (For an interesting case dealing with this general issue, but under the rubric of state and federal unfair competition law, and federal trademark and anticybersquatting law, see Lamparello v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:14 pm by Rumpole
And in the middle of it all, he raised a family AND carried on decades long affair with British/Soviet spy Guy Burgess. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Gnango, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1691 (26 July 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) LK v Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] EWHC 1928 (QB) (15 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Wood v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] EWHC 1769 (Admin) (30 June 2010) Nursing and Midwifery Council v Okon- Burgess [2010] EWHC 1816 (Admin) (05 July 2010) Medical Justice, R (on the… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Adrian P. Thomas
COMPENSATION OF TRUSTEES WHO ARE ALSO BENEFICIARIES In a recent Florida Second DCA case, Burgess v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
(Hat Tip: Media Law Prof Blog).We had previously mentioned the Twitter Novel Contest by the State Bar of Texas, which was open to lawyers from any state and called for 140 character entries. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:14 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court JR17 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2010] UKSC 27 (23 June 2010) Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 (23 June 2010) Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No. 2) [2010] UKSC 26 (23 June 2010) Source: www.bailii.org.uk [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm by Anna Christensen
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]