Search for: "State v. Burnham" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by James Romoser
The blog of Burnham & Borokhov, PLLC, analyzes the petitioner’s opening brief and the arguments of several amicus briefs in Van Buren v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Burnham and Gorokhov’s legal blog offers a post suggesting that Van Buren v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am by Robert Brammer
In 1911, many suffragettes boycotted the census in protest, stating that if they did not count to have the vote, then they would not be counted on the census. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Level One Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Burnham, 2019 BCCA 407, the Court of Appeal of the British Columbia handed down judgment. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” At Burnham & Gorokov’s legal blog, law student Sarah Kelley discusses the oral argument in City of Hays v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Srinivasan and Burnham get into a tangle over how to interpret Omar v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Larry
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Roger M. Michalski
Heitner) or expanding, preserving, and creating caveat categories (e.g., Burnham v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Another look at the argument in Dimaya comes from Ziran Zhang at Burnham & Gorokhov’s eponymous blog. [read post]