Search for: "State v. Burnham" Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Cplr 3211 May Be Directed Only Against a Cause of Action or a Defense, Not a Motion In Matter of Burnham v Brenna, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2624043 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.), the father moved to dismiss the mother's motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 to renew her prior motion and for an award of an attorney's fee. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm by The Legal Blog
As to acknowledgement is writing within Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 5 see Viscount Burnham v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
 constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Integra and Burnham sued Merck, Cheresh, and Scripps for patent infringement.307 Writing for a unanimous Court in Merck KGaA v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
The fourth and final decision is Stevens’ brief concurrence in Burnham v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
To be admissible, such testimony must  comply with the requirements for reliability and relevance established in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]