Search for: "State v. Bush" Results 1 - 20 of 3,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
The thorny and increasingly important issue of jurisdiction went before the Court of Appeal earlier this month in Bush v Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865.The Facts: The parties were married in London in April 1988 and went to live in Tanzania in 1991 or 1992. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:40 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Speaking to the Chicago Tribune editorial board, retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor reportedly stated that the Court took the case of Bush v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:36 am
Moreover, examining state practice before and after 9/11, the author comes to the conclusion that the Bush Doctrine is not an ‘invention’ of the Bush administration, as other US administrations and states have used the same arguments. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Jack Goldsmith
But they insist that when the state employs coercion to achieve security, it must abide by rules designed to forestall government abuse and respect human rights. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
In 2012, Justice Antonin Scalia told CNN that in his time on the bench, the Bush v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:00 am by Quimbee
The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, but later, the United States Supreme Court held in Rasul v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:27 pm by Mary Paige Smith
Bush was the winner of the 2000 presidential election. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” On December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 “per curiam” (non-specially authored) decision, Bush v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” On December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 “per curiam” (non-specially authored) decision, Bush v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 4:46 am
The case, previously blogged here, "Bush Lied - They Died" T-Shirts and Free Speech has resulted in a federal court giving the State of Arizona a remedial course in First Amendment law. [read post]