Search for: "State v. Butler" Results 21 - 40 of 1,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am by CodeX
On November 16, 2023, the Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) of the State Bar of California developed and adopted as Practical Guidance a set of duties that carefully reconciled existing laws with directives on how lawyers should act when using generative AI tools. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to writer, E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump is set to begin on Tuesday 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
In December, the Court granted review in Fischer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am by CMS
” On 19 January 2019, Mr Butler of Balgores Property sent Ms George an email stating that he had spoken with Ms Cannell and that she advised that as part of Ms George’s terms she should not be approaching LCA’s clients. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Udit Mahalingam
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Sara Notario
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]