Search for: "State v. Callahan" Results 241 - 260 of 417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Charles Russell of Callahan, Thompson, Sherman & Caudill argued for Sullivan and Paul Cane of Paul Hastings argued for Oracle. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Callahan of Sacramento and Senior Circuit Judge Edward Leavy of Portland, Ore. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
"  See United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:16 am by Jon Sands
The prisoner's complaint failed to state a claim.U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:28 am by WSLL
Reversed.Case Name: LEEKS CANYON RANCH, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company; LEEKS CANYON, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company; ELIZABETH LOCKHART and KELLY LOCKHART, wife and husband, Appellants v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Sarausad (07-772), on whether, during habeas review, federal courts must accept state court determinations that jury instructions correctly explain state law regarding accomplice liability; and Hedgpeth v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Callahan (07-751), on whether police officers were entitled to qualified immunity for conducting a warrantless search based on the signal of an undercover informant who had previously entered the home, and whether the Court should overrule its decision in Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Sarausad (07-772) - federal habeas review of jury instructions in state criminal case Chrones v. [read post]