Search for: "State v. Callahan" Results 261 - 280 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Callahan (07-751), on whether police officers were entitled to qualified immunity for conducting a warrantless search based on the signal of an undercover informant who had previously entered the home, and whether the Court should overrule its decision in Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Sarausad (07-772) - federal habeas review of jury instructions in state criminal case Chrones v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Kozinski also files a separate dissent, also joined by Clifton, Bybee and Callahan, argues that the Supremes in Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am by Derek T. Muller
Ming Dai earned a “dissental” from rehearing en banc from 10 active judges (Callahan, Bybee, Bea, M. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
  Maybe there's a case in which Judge Fisher, Tallman and Callahan were a panel that unanimously reversed a death penalty. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
Magistrate Judge Callahan issued the warrant on January 22.U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Callahan, 872 P.2d 487, 494 (Utah App. 1994) (trade secret is a property right) with ConFold Pacific, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
"The only place where I think Judge Kozinski, joined by Judge Callahan, goes astray is in the dispositive section on harmless error. [read post]
The
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am by Jon Sands
The dissenters wring their hands, shrug their shoulders, and say that under AEDPA the state court's ruling was not unreasonable (really).US v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
Callahan (07-751), a case involving a police search of a home without a warrant. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
Callahan 17-552 Issues: (1) Whether, in deadly force shooting cases, the U.S. [read post]