Search for: "State v. Capelle"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2009, 3:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Lediaev v Vallen [2009] EWCA Civ 156 (05 March 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Stanley v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 404 (Admin) (04 March 2009) Von Der Pahlen v Leoben High Court, Austria [2009] EWHC 383 (Admin) (04 March 2009) Capel Parish Council v Surrey County Council [...] [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:54 am
Grace Capel is a BPTC student and volunteers at Hammersmith and Fulham Community Law Centre. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 3:27 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Velev, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2162 (12 September 2008) Thomas, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2151 (18 September 2008) Saldana, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2154 (23 September 2008) Belaid, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2153 (23 September 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1080 (24 September 2008) Deutsche Bank AG & Ors v Asia Pacific Broadband… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
04/21/09 Mirror of Justice Blog:"Here are a couple of letters to the speaker of the Connecticut house arguing for meaningful religious liberty exemptions in the bill [to implement the state supreme court's October 2008 decision in Kerrigan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:34 pm
In Elite Cleaning Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
This is set out as follows, in Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol 34, para 1087, fn 13: “Supporting or opposing memorials or petitions purporting to be signed by petitioners as to which there is no proof of the signatures or evidence of the representations made to those who sign are inadmissible: Rector and Churchwardens of Capel St Mary, Suffolk v Packard [1927] P 289; Re Christ Church, Chislehurst [1947] 1 All ER 146 at 150–151, [1973] 1 WLR 1317 at 1321. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
A more recent example is Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd (2018) where the court stated that when considering reasonable steps to mitigate, a party should consider the interests of both contracting parties and not just its own. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
The State has stated that the SyRI legislation contains sufficient guarantees to protect the privacy of everyone. [read post]
