Search for: "State v. Carbone" Results 41 - 60 of 1,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2008, 6:42 am
Multiple states and environmental groups filed suit today against the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 11:43 pm
EPA both will attract more attention than KSR v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:48 am by UChicagoLaw
Corey,which asks whether California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) program should bind producers and shippers from other states. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:39 am by drdiekman
Cos., LLC v Carbone, NY Slip Op 05664 (2d Dept. 2011). [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:59 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals Rules that Clean Power Plan Will Remain in Effect - State of West Virginia, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:59 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals Rules that Clean Power Plan Will Remain in Effect - State of West Virginia, et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:31 pm
Feminist Law Professor Naomi Cahn (George Washington Law School) and June Carbone (University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Law) has posted to ssrn her article Red Families v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:43 pm by jly
Cahn and Carbone’s important new book, Red Families v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several  Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries:   (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass Production and other uses… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
 The EPA and its federal partners intend to discuss the development of appropriate EM&V protocols for such measures with states in the coming years. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm by David Doniger
  So EPA took the last-resort step of issuing those carbon permits itself where states could not or would not do so. [read post]