Search for: "State v. Carey" Results 141 - 160 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2024, 7:26 pm by ernst
”   In “The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law,” 123 Columbia Law Review 1533 (2023), Allread takes Oklahoma v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 4:02 am
" The state failed to offer any explanation of the purpose of the challenged rule.In Harris v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
  The Supreme Court granted the petition, vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision, and remanded the case to the lower court for reconsideration in light of its recent decision in Carey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:04 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the defendants wrote on their website that there would be: “further evidence of a fraud investigation into Framptons, and not just into Mr Carey. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:28 am by gmlevine
“Tellingly, Respondent never even stated or claimed that it is or has been commonly known by that name. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
The case was returned to the Sixth Circuit Court for a new look under two prior precedents, Carey v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
But the Supremes reversed, telling the Ninth Circuit to reconsider the case in light of the SCOTUS decision in Carey v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:24 am by Orin Kerr
S. 915 (vacating and remanding in light of Carey v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court found that the language in Section 4(a) of the Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement, which states in relevant part that the parties and all their respective “lawyers, and all others who may take any interest in the matters herein released (the Stolper Releasees) and (the Carey Releasees), collectively (the Releasees), hereby fully and forever release, acquit, and discharge each other and each other‘s . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
  In a footnote, Judge Reavley writes for the 5th Circuit:  "The State narrowly describes the right as the court did in Williams v. [read post]