Search for: "State v. Carey" Results 141 - 160 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 2:28 am by gmlevine
“Tellingly, Respondent never even stated or claimed that it is or has been commonly known by that name. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
The case was returned to the Sixth Circuit Court for a new look under two prior precedents, Carey v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
But the Supremes reversed, telling the Ninth Circuit to reconsider the case in light of the SCOTUS decision in Carey v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:24 am by Orin Kerr
S. 915 (vacating and remanding in light of Carey v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court found that the language in Section 4(a) of the Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement, which states in relevant part that the parties and all their respective “lawyers, and all others who may take any interest in the matters herein released (the Stolper Releasees) and (the Carey Releasees), collectively (the Releasees), hereby fully and forever release, acquit, and discharge each other and each other‘s . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
  In a footnote, Judge Reavley writes for the 5th Circuit:  "The State narrowly describes the right as the court did in Williams v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Here is how Tymkovich (who, by the way, argued on behalf of the state of Colorado unsuccessfully in Romer v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:43 pm
The court noted the controlling authority on point was a 1964 Court of Claims case, Carey v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
In laying the foundation, the government inquired of Carey concerning the timing of the message (Carey: `I believe I wrote that E-mail shortly, very shortly, after the conversation [with Ferber]'), and Carey's emotional state as a result of that conversation (Carey:`"I was very upset, panicked, and very much wanted to get Mr. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
The New York Times has this editorial in today's paper which states that the board is "disappointed" with Monday's ruling in Carey v. [read post]