Search for: "State v. Carter" Results 21 - 40 of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
Carter concluded that “the real property at issue was transferred in fee simple absolute, and the portion of the devise attempting to restrict the alienability of the property is void and of no effect as being repugnant to the devise and the public policy of this State. [read post]
Former US President Jimmy Carter Monday filed an amicus brief to state his disagreement with a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, calling the ruling “deeply mistaken” and “dangerous. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am by MBettman
On August 30, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Carter v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:36 am by SHG
Marco’s response was Brandenburg v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:25 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Rashid Mayo, Dequan Shields, and Eddie Tarver, the appellants, were tried jointly in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the murder of Carter Scott (“Carter”) and the attempted murder of Rashaw Scott (“Rashaw”). [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:27 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Rashid Mayo, Dequan Shields, and Eddie Tarver, the appellants, were tried jointly in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the murder of Carter Scott (“Carter”) and the attempted murder of Rashaw Scott (“Rashaw”). [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:22 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Rashid Mayo, Dequan Shields, and Eddie Tarver, the appellants, were tried jointly in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the murder of Carter Scott (“Carter”) and the attempted murder of Rashaw Scott (“Rashaw”).1 The jury convicted each appellant of one count of first-degree murder, ... [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In my article of April 2011, I reported about the decision in Aecon Buildings v. [read post]