Search for: "State v. Casey"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
In June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am
You might have thought this post-Casey interference to reproductive freedom got killed four years ago in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:55 am
In 2016, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:59 am
If your personal injury lawyer instructs you not to file a claim with your health insurer concerning your medical care, you may instead be in the hands of a “lien doctor” [Sara Randazzo, WSJ, paywall] Supreme Court passes up opportunity to decide whether the Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to business defendants, and also whether a state can conjure an excessive fine out of existence by conceptually slicing it up into smaller daily fines [Ilya Shapiro on… [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Casey’s undue burden standard. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am
In fact, that is exactly what the state of Louisiana has expressly asked the court to do in June Medical Services v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 8:55 am
In 2016, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Ellis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:47 am
The law, Louisiana Act 620, would leave only one abortion clinic in the state. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 7:07 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 11:00 am
Casey, which allowed states to regulate pre-viability abortions as long as the regulations do not pose an undue burden on abortion access. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
-Amarillo 2012, pet. ref’d); Casey v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
Cir. 1990) (stating that “apparatus claimscover what a device is, not what a device does”). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Casey denied the correction officer's motion as untimely. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Casey denied the correction officer's motion as untimely. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:15 am
Casey that shows “that a law which furthers a state’s interest in protecting the women’s health or potential life, ‘may not prohibit any woman from making the ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy before viability.'” The court viewed the state’s expressed interest in preventing discrimination in the case as intertwined with the same state interest in potential life discussed in Roe and Casey. [read post]
