Search for: "State v. Castaldi" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 2:12 pm
The “judgment” went on to state that the court “finds by a preponderance of the evidence[4] that both defendants Alfonse Castaldi and Theresa Castaldi have acted with malice and with oppression toward plaintiff Ken Baker warranting an award of punitive damages to be assessed at a separate trial. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:35 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
.), Executive federalism in the EUSeptember 20, 2011: Anastassia V. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Castaldi, No. 07-3452 Conviction and sentence for mail fraud and embezzlement from an employee benefits plan are affirmed over objections regarding: 1) sufficiency of the indictment; 2) admissibility of a mug shot of defendant; 3) exclusion of certain testimony as hearsay; 4) sufficiency of the evidence; 5) consideration of the relevant sentencing factors; and 6) evidence of defendant's intent to embezzle. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]