Search for: "State v. Caswell" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
” • In the case of Shirely v Caswell [2001] 1 Costs LR 1, Chadwick, LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, stated: “The costs of issues abandoned, or not pursued at trial, ought, prima facie, to be disallowed against the party incurring them on an assessment of the costs of that party by the costs judge - because, again prima facie, they are costs which have been unnecessarily incurred in the litigation. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
 SCOTUSblog reports that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Packingham v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
 SCOTUSblog reports that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Packingham v. [read post]