Search for: "State v. Catalano" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2015, 9:50 am by Ron Coleman
“Defendants have failed to produce any evidence that measures short of categorical bans would not have sufficed to remedy the perceived risks of such advertising being misleading,” the judge wrote in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:48 am by Ron Coleman
“Defendants have failed to produce any evidence that measures short of categorical bans would not have sufficed to remedy the perceived risks of such advertising being misleading,” the judge wrote in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm by Monroe Freedman
The rules, which went into effect on Feb. 1, 2007, and are codified in New York's Code of Professional Responsibility at 22 NYCRR §1200, were adopted by the four state Appellate Divisions and challenged by Alexander & Catalano, a Syracuse-based personal injury firm, as well as Public Citizen Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by George M. Wallace
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Constitutional Law Many New Lawyer Advertising Rules Struck; State FailsTo Show Content Ban Advanced Public's Protection Alexander & Catalano LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:40 pm
State, 710 So.2d 635 Fla. 5th DCA 1998), The victory was successfully argued by a great attorney, a great guy, and--defendant in the case--Richard Catalano (Fla. 2nd DCA 2011, 2D10-973, May 11, 2011). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:45 am by Eric Turkewitz
Cahill, the State of New York took aim at the ads of Alexander & Catalano, as they claimed, among other things:Lawyers being retained by aliens;Lawyers having the ability to leap tall buildings in a single bound;Lawyers stomping around downtown Syracuse, Godzilla-style.The State Attorney General claimed the ads were unethical because they were literally false. [read post]