Search for: "State v. Champagne"
Results 21 - 40
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm
See Clifford v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 3:17 pm
The case is Marin Asenov v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:11 pm
*Baze v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am
He returned on November 4 with champagne and glasses, saying he was “moving to Florida”, but did not. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
My dear techno.pal Bruce Dorner will leave the practice of law and become a Practice Management Advisor in a warm, southern state - a state smart enough to recognize his incredible value to its Bar membership. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
Case Information: Larry and Lynn Welk v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
Trademark - Fabulous Fizz New York State Champagne. [read post]
30 May 2018, 11:00 am
This is, naturally, the decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Petrovic v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Roederer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
In Ponzetto v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:22 am
Here’s the text of an order issued by Louisiana state court Judge Curtis Sigur last Tuesday, in Groner v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
First, for the reasons stated at [16]-[18] above, this construction of the Champagne Heidsieck principle should not be accepted. [read post]
