Search for: "State v. Champagne" Results 101 - 120 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by Kashmir Hill & Elie Mystal
Can one city in the Prairie State hold its own against two cities in the Show-Me State? [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Given the state of the art, it was obvious to anyone who needed a stent of this nature that he would have to use taxol. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:40 am by Jay Wexler
  That's why I love this case I taught yesterday in Environmental Law called Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:31 am
Counsel moved for an instructed verdict due to the State's failure to carry its burden of proof. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
In Roederer, the defendant sold Spanish sparkling wine under the name CRISTALINO, infringing the claimant’s rights in its CRISTAL brand of champagne. [read post]