Search for: "State v. Champagne" Results 141 - 160 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
A few days ago, District Judge Christina Snyder issued her 57-page ruling in American Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
However, Peter King of Sports Illustrated stated that the decision may not be the champagne-popping moment for the NFLPA. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by Kashmir Hill & Elie Mystal
Can one city in the Prairie State hold its own against two cities in the Show-Me State? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
the product as a vodka, displaying it among the vodkas and in some cases expressly stating it to be a vodka. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am by Jim Jenkins
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
Drink and drugs were the main preoccupation of some of Europe's finest legal brains this morning, when the Court of First Instance rendered its decision in Case Tâ€'234/06, Giampietro Torresan v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Klosterbrauerei Weissenohe GmbH & Co. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:52 am
If the defendant had simply intentionally murdered someone, they would only be required to comply with these postrelease conditions for 36 months.The proportionality argument is that this lifetime postrelease sentence is unconstitutional under the three factors set forth in State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
My dear techno.pal Bruce Dorner will leave the practice of law and become a Practice Management Advisor in a warm, southern state - a state smart enough to recognize his incredible value to its Bar membership. [read post]