Search for: "State v. Chang " Results 1 - 20 of 50,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Sandy Rokhlin
Apple: Changes in the Apple App Store to Come Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:53 am
R (Friends of the Earth and another) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2009] EWCA Civ 810; [2009] WLR (D) 276 “On an application for judicial review of the Secretary of State's alleged failure to take steps to implement targets specified in the Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000 and the UK [...] [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 6:44 am by Daily Record Staff
Before the case was submitted to the jury, the State nol prossed each of the ... [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:20 am
Canterbury City Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Green v Same [2009] WLR (D) 103 “When planning permission was granted for a change of use, a condition could be imposed which would have the effect of regulating the permission in order to control any future expansion of the use by way of [...] [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:28 am
The State made the change on March 15, 2006, almost two years later, and the trial began on March 20, 2006.This cannot be right after Fajardo v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:43 am by Orin Kerr
United States, the pro bono case  I worked on over the last few months on whether the good faith exception of the Fourth Amendment applies to changing law. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Some states will implement tax changes adopted by elected representatives while others will implement changes adopted through ballot measures. [read post]
27 May 2018, 6:18 am by Jeff Schmitt
My article, Courts, Backlash, and Social Change: Learning from the History of Prigg v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am by Heather K. Gerken
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
AS (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “The statutory provision that on hearing an appeal against a refusal of entry clearance the adjudicator or tribunal could have regard only to the circumstances appertaining at the time of the decision to refuse and could have no regard to any subsequent change in [...] [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]