Search for: "State v. Chapman" Results 1 - 20 of 698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2024, 7:11 am by fjhinojosa
Soonpaa’s article Using Composition Theory and Scholarship to Teach Legal Writing More Effectively is cited in the following article: Carolyn V. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by Mikaela Wells
In its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
Chapman * Allegedly Wrong VeRO Notice of Claimed Infringement Not Actionable–Dudnikov v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
In 2000, he wrote the opinion in People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Bruno Aiub (Monark) and State Prosecution Office (São Paulo, MPSP) v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says qualified immunity cannot attach at this early stage of the case.The case is Mehaylo v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Udit Mahalingam
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]