Search for: "State v. Cherry"
Results 1 - 20
of 730
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
It was accepted that the Patent was at least novel over Aichi as the latter related to a cherry-picker, rather than a telehandler (the difference being that the arm of a cherry picker can rotate). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Unlike Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:49 pm
Jarkesy and Corner Post v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
Since plaintiff essentially alleges that defendants “provided inadequate and ineffective representation,” the claim is “properly treated . . . as sounding in legal malpractice” (Cherry Hill Mkt. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
That is, after all, what the text of the Impeachment Clause actually states. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
Supreme Court "distorts and cherry-picks historical evidence. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm
See State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Cherry Creek Sch. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
In the district court, a careful judge excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, who relied heavily upon animal studies and who cherry picked and distorted the available epidemiology.[9] The Court of Appeals reversed, in an unsigned, non-substantive opinion that interjected an asymmetric standard of review.[10] After granting review, the Supreme Court engaged with the substantive validity issues passed over by the intermediate appellate court. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
In their particular case, the Patentee argued that a summary table provided in the description represented a shorthand for stating all the disclosed combinations individually. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm
From Judge Gerald McHugh's decision yesterday in Tannous v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
Johnson Fellow:“A Legal Form of Marriage”: The Legality of Queer Families in the United States, 1830-1920 Anin Luo, Princeton University Empathizing beyond Humanity: The 1970s Emergence of Personhood for Animals and the Environment Robyn Morse, University of Virginia, John Wertheimer/Davidson College Fellow: Enterprising Value: Labor Transitions and Legal Maneuvers During the Rise of the Oil Economy in Bahrain Wallace Teska, Stanford University, William… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:20 am
” “A cause of action for malpractice cannot be maintained as against an individual attorney hired by plaintiffs union to handle a disciplinary proceeding under the union’s CBA (see Cherry v Koehler & Isaacs LLP, 96 AD3d 507 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
