Search for: "State v. Christen"
Results 1 - 20
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Stavropoulos and others v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:15 am
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (0): NFP criminal opinions today (8): Steven Christener v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 5:31 am
Court of Appeals in an opinion by Judge Harry Pregerson, and joined by Judges Marsha Berzon and Morgan Christen, held that the state of Arizona could not deny... [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:23 pm
Christen v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:12 pm
Although “properly executed” child pornography investigations by NCIS might be excepted, Judge Christen noted that Logan’s RoundUp query was not limited to members of the military, and instead “cast a net across the entire state of Washington, [including] countless devices” falling outside the jurisdiction of the UCMJ. [read post]
15 May 2013, 1:00 pm
State officials are absolutely immune for these sorts of executive, prosecutorial decisions. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 10:15 am
United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
Hallett's activities, a ton of which are in Canada.The Ninth Circuit says that they do, reversing the district court's decision to the contrary.So it's Traders 1, Pirates 0.Oh, one more thing.Judge Christen's opinion cites a particular Ninth Circuit case -- Reebok v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:31 pm
Ayala v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:08 pm
Alfaro v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:41 pm
Jones v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:17 am
Mayes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:02 pm
It's just that Judge Christen continues to use the word "animus" in her description of the underlying mental state, and that word is typically used to describe a particular mental state that doesn't always exist in her chosen definition.)I'll go even further. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:33 am
Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
