Search for: "State v. Clayton" Results 1 - 20 of 1,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 12:50 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to dismiss — Double jeopardy On two separate occasions, a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Clayton D. [read post]
3 May 2017, 7:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Double jeopardy — Trial after mistrial On two separate occasions, a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Clayton D. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:41 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Bill Cassara and our friends at the Army Defense Appellate Division have filed a cert petition seeking review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:48 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The SG has filed this brief in opposition to the cert petition in Clayton v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:15 am by scanner1
GOVERNOR STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity; ATTORNEY GENERAL TIMOTHY FOX, in his official capacity; MONTANA BOARD OF REGENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION; COMMISSIONER OF HIGHER EDUCATION CLAYTON CHRISTIAN, in his official capacity; and the STATE OF MONTANA, Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:46 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0269, 2011 MT 150N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am by Ben Allen
  Citing language from the obstruction of justice provision, USSG § 2J1.2, dicta in its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 12:09 pm by Ken Herzinger
Clayton said the touchstones of this approach are disclosure and materiality, citing bedrock Supreme Court precedent TSC Industries and Basic v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 12:09 pm by Ken Herzinger
Clayton said the touchstones of this approach are disclosure and materiality, citing bedrock Supreme Court precedent TSC Industries and Basic v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:20 am by Jill Roamer, J.D. and Katanya Mintz
Last month, the Supreme Court of the United States decided whether or not Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 encompasses discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation. [read post]