Search for: "State v. Clayton" Results 1 - 20 of 1,096
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
” On cross-examination, Clayton stated that “brakes were working normal when I road tested it. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
But because he agreed with the government that the merger was likely to harm competition “in at least some relevant markets”–that is, on some of the specific city-to-city routes among the hundreds identified in the government’s complaint–he ruled it a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Section 7 of the Clayton Act prohibits mergers that harm competition in “in any line” of commerce. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am by SHG
  See United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 18 December 2023, HHJ Clayton handed down judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Spencer v McKay [2023] VCC 2238. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 8:28 am by Richmond Cariaga
Supreme Court reinforced this protection in the landmark 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
One of the hallmarks of Chair Khan’s tenure has been the FTC’s centralization of authority throughout the administrative state, acting as a vehicle for policy through the FTC’s ostensibly broad authority. [read post]