Search for: "State v. Clifford" Results 101 - 120 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Law Society of British Columbia', (Forthcoming in the University of British Columbia Law Review, (2017) Volume 50:3).Clifford Rosky, Still Not Equal: A Report from the Red States, (After Marriage Equality: The Future of LGBT Rights pgs. 73-101 (2016)).SSRN (Islamic Law)Hae Won Bang, Production of Islamic Knowledge in the European Diaspora: A Case Study of Digital Texts from a British Muslim Halal Certifier, (May 30, 2016).Mmaphuti David Tuba, Lodhi 5 Properties Investments… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Christians, Clifford G. et al., Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies (2009). [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Incrementally, Clifford seemed to convince other Justices (and lower courts) that there was some kernel of binding law here. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)(Spearman QC) – damages of £5,000 were awarded for unauthorised disclosure of private information, see our case comment. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:03 am by Edward Smith
Accidental Water Damage Claim Accidental Water Damage Claim Insurers sometimes deny water damage claims, even some of those filed as “Sudden and Accidental” water damage. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 12:06 am by John Diekman
  The party nvoking collateral estoppel has the burden to show the identity of the issues, while the party trying to avoid application of the doctrine must establish the lack of a full and fair opportunity to litigate.Student note:  Where a federal court declines to exercise jurisdiction over a plaintiff's state law claims, collateral estoppel operates as a bar, provided that the federal court decided issues identical to those raised by the plaintiff's state… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”This determination, said the court, was dispositive of Clifford’s NYSHRL claims.Finding that [1] Rockland County had met its burden of demonstrating that the issues Clifford raised in her State action were identical to those decided against her in the federal action and [2] Clifford failed to demonstrate that she did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate these issues in her federal action, the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court… [read post]
11 May 2016, 7:10 am by Daily Record Staff
The jury acquitted Clifford of charges of first-degree ... [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  There is a judgment on liability and quantum (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)), although Mr Justice Mann’s earlier decision dismissing Mr Clifford’s strike out application on limitation and triviality grounds (Burrell v Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch)) is arguably of wider importance. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 19 February 2016, judgment was handed down in the case of Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch). [read post]