Search for: "State v. Clifford"
Results 121 - 140
of 310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Nicola tells all.* Can the State automatically acquire ownership of your copyright? [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Blog: Temas de propiedad intelectual Víctor M. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE * Never too late 64 - [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies |… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
It wasn’t until 1987 that Clifford Turner and Coward Chance merged, for example, and in 2004, when Slaughter and May celebrated its 125th anniversary, most of the people who had ever been partners were still alive. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
(Eleonora takes the floor).* Confidence, privacy and a question of fax: butler's claim can't be struck outPaul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) is a High Court, Chancery Division decision addressing a sad story of faxes, Royal Families, and litigation that should end up with a settlement. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Jackson and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:13 pm
The Library of Parliament today published a post on its HillNotes blog that refers to the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:21 pm
A magistrate judge in Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:12 am
” Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:41 am
Swirsky v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:34 pm
Daniel Kovera, et al., v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Since the Justices’ ruling in 2008 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:25 am
In PhoneDog v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:08 pm
Both concern complains by victim of sexual assault by Max Clifford. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:52 am
") AC35312 - State v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:36 am
") AC35542 - State v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am
In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]