Search for: "State v. Close" Results 1 - 20 of 31,416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm by Marcel Pemsel
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
These proposed rules come in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
May 11, 2005) (“Illinois courts disfavor and closely scrutinize restrictive covenants because they are repugnant to the public policy encouraging an open and competitive marketplace”); Cambridge Eng’g., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action was descended from the first Statute of Westminster adopted in England in 1275, incorporated in New York’s earliest common law, and first codified in this State in a 1787 statute that closely tracks the current provision (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14-15 [2014]; Amalfitano, 12 NY3d at 12). [read post]