Search for: "State v. Coburn" Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Scarduzio states that ‘[h]umor was employed by many of the 12 judges … observed’ in two United States municipal courts. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by admin
. ____________________ Dale Joerling (Thompson Coburn LLP) You couldn’t live in the United States very long without at some point seeing abbreviated rules for a sweepstakes. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by Lyle Denniston
  The state Supreme Court found that Hall had an IQ of 71. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by Michael McCann
Wallace, Jr.PartnerChair, Sports Law GroupThompson Coburn LLPThe conference has a number of distinguished speakers with sports law ties, including Paul Clement, who argued for the NFL in Brady v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
Maybe Team Strauss/Anziska needs to refocus its efforts and give Senators Boxer, Grassley, and Coburn a call.Gomez-Jimenez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Lovechilde
Under a Supreme Court decision called Printz v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm by Mike Scarcella
Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) and the yet-to-be-determined Republican nominee for president. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Rick Hills
But before you snigger at Norquist, consider the SCOTUS's failure in Arizona Free Enterprise Club's PAC v Bennett to distinguish Regan v Taxation With Representation. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
It would be a good start if Tom Coburn, the first Republican senator to attack the Norquist papacy, will give strength to other members of his own party. [read post]