Search for: "State v. Coffman"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:41 pm
Fowler v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm
Coffman, 859 F. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:46 am
” In Coffman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Heath Coffman & Kevin C. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
” Coffman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:38 am
For those of us who remember State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Coffman and Ex parte Levitt are critical to this point. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:40 am
Yesterday, the Colorado Supreme Court in Fuentes-Espinoza v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:50 pm
Public Service Commission of West Virginia[8] and Federal Power Commission v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 1:34 pm
In November, in the case of Oasis Legal Finance Group, LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Armour, Inc., 929 P.2d 340, 347 (Utah 1996); Coffman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
(City of San Jose v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
Balto Many opponents of Google’s business practices have trotted out the United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
The case is Coffman v. [read post]
