Search for: "State v. Collins" Results 21 - 40 of 2,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between Monday 11 November  and Friday 15 November 2024, Collins Rice J heard the trial in the case of RTM v Bonne Terre Limited and another KB-2023-000775. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Sir Peter Lane (sitting as a Judge in the High Court) heard the appeal and defendant’s application in the case of Secretary of State for Education v Marples  KA-2024-000095. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 4:15 pm
§ 600.2 (stating that a HEA nonprofit must be “operated by one or more nonprofit corporations or associations”); 20 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
Last month in the Courts On Monday 29 July 2024, Collins Rice J heard an application for a final injunction in the case of Northcott v Hundeyin KB-2023-002761 On the same day Johnson J heard a contempt application in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Specific Performance Counterclaim and the Dueling Summary Judgment Motions On remand, Leogrande filed an answer with a single counterclaim for specific performance, a cause of action which, as we have written, is well suited to enforce buy-sell agreements against recalcitrant buyers or sellers (see Estate of Collins, Neville, Roadie and Shaw, and Berle). [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:36 pm by Tobias Lutzi
On the basis of case law in England and the U.S. involving private parties, Collins argued that the principle of comity has often been misused in favour of the interests of the forum state. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:24 am by Eric Goldman
If that were enough for state action, every large government contractor would be a state actor. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
  Indeed, I have critiqued the Court’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]