Search for: "State v. Collins" Results 41 - 60 of 2,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
  Indeed, I have critiqued the Court’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
Edward, Reconsidering the Legacy of New York Times V. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Let me begin by stating that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 24 June 2024 Collins Rice J handed down judgment on meaning in Bridgen v Hancock [2024] EWHC 1603 (KB). [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
On 17 June 2024 there was a pre-trial review in the case of Bates v Rubuython KB-2023-002975 before Collins Rice J and a disposal hearing in the case of Codnor v Thorpe QB-2020-004564 before Richard Spearman KC. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
For instance, Lord Collins a former non-permanent Member of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, delivered the leading judgment in the significant cross-border matter of Ryder Industries Ltd v Chan Shui Woo, with the agreement of all other judges on the panel. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Wednesday 12 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in George v Cannell and another [2024] UKSC 19 On the same day there was a preliminary issues trial before Collins Rice J in the case of Bridgen MP v Hancock MP KB-2023-002309. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]