Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 1 - 20
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 9:56 am
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2008] WLR (D) 284 “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the… [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 “In relation to the national police computer it was for the data controller to determine the purposes for which data was processed. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:56 am
United States essentially brings to bear the axiom of Justice Benjamin Cardozo, stated so many years ago, that the criminal should not go free because he constable has blundered. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and Others v Information Commissioner, Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening Court of Appeal “There could be no question of the retention of records of old minor convictions being held in the national police computer to be either excessive or being held for longer than necessary. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:04 am
E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and Another House of Lords “The positive obligation imposed on the state by article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights to prevent the infliction by third parties of inhuman or degrading treatment was not unqualified and absolute. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Van Colle and Another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary House of Lords “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call him as a witness. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:40 pm
Caren Myers Morrison (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posted The Drug Dealer, the Narc, and the Very Tiny Constable: Reflections on United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:21 pm
Molinet v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:28 am
E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission intervening) [2008] UKHL 66; [2008] WLR (D) 351 “The positive obligation imposed on the state and its emanations by art 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to prevent the infliction by third parties of inhuman or degrading treatment was not unqualified, and was an obligation to do all that was reasonably to be… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am
The news is very bad if you are a Chief Constable. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:10 am
In Lloyd v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:22 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 37For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary & Anor [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The recent libel claim in Bento v The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police [2012] EWHC 1525 (QB) is a striking exception. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
In Fontana v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:34 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC19240 - State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
Applying Hellewell v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [1995] 1 WLR 804 at 810F the Court considered that such use was reasonable. [read post]
