Search for: "State v. Constantine"
Results 41 - 60
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
” Constantine v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
I’m David Golden, a partner in Constantine Cannon’s antitrust practice. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
United States (Indian Commerce Clause)Whiteagle v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:05 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 8:43 pm
He proclaimed Islam as the State religion. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:24 am
Will FTC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 3:44 pm
Hunt v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:09 pm
Branch v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:46 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment this morning in Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (the Austrian Supreme Court). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film… [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:29 pm
Constantin Films v UPC is pending in the CJEU. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 10:55 am
The Court distinguished the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Saints Constantine v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 10:55 am
The Court distinguished the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Saints Constantine v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:53 am
Pappas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:20 am
This analysis is complicated by the fact that current copyright law, at least under the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
TOMMY CONSTANTINE RACING, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, and TOMMY CONSTANTINE, a/k/a THOMAS CONSTANTINE, individually, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:30 am
Constantine Flamio
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
